Skip to content
The Edge of the Shift

Home / Inside the day

Training and the Thing on Your Day Off

Required activity outside the shift is working time whether or not it looks like the job, and e-learning at home is the version nobody records.

Inside the day · Reference

Mandatory e-learning, 500 people

Modules per person per year

9

Average completion time

35 min

Hours per person

5 h 15

Across the workforce

2,625 hours

Most of it is completed at home or during a break. The learning system knows exactly when each module was finished, and nobody has ever compared those timestamps with the roster.

Training, team meetings, briefings, appraisals, compliance modules and toolbox talks are all work. Where they happen inside the shift that is uncontroversial. Where they happen outside it, the arrangements get vague.

The practical lesson in “Training and the Thing on Your Day Off” is that a timesheet only becomes reliable through a process people can operate consistently. For teams exploring attendance point system, Monitask resources for attendance point system can add time and project context, provided collection is proportionate, access is limited and every consequential inference receives human review.

The vagueness has moved online. Mandatory e-learning is now the largest single category of required activity performed outside recorded hours, and it is the easiest to measure and the least measured.

For a separate benchmark relevant to “Training and the Thing on Your Day Off”, consult the EEOC retaliation guidance. Use it to test record quality, approvals, retention, employee rights and exception handling against the real workflow rather than treating a software report as self-explanatory evidence.

The general position

Required training is working time. The tests are the familiar ones: the employer requires it, the employer specifies the content, and declining has consequences.

That holds whether it takes place in a room, at a desk, at home, or on a phone, and whether it takes fifteen minutes or two days. The medium does not change the character.

Voluntary development that the person chose, that is not required and carries no consequence if skipped, is different and genuinely is their own.

The middle category — strongly encouraged, mentioned in appraisals, "optional but everybody does it" — follows the same analysis as everything else in this collection and usually lands on the required side.

E-learning specifically

The learning management system records exactly when each module was started and completed, to the second, for every person.

Join those timestamps to the roster. Modules completed outside rostered hours are required activity performed off the clock, counted precisely, with no estimation.

The result is routinely several hours per person per year, concentrated in the weeks before a compliance deadline, and completed in the evening because there was no time during the shift.

It is one query and almost nobody has run it.

Why it happens outside the shift

Because the shift is full. A role scheduled at full utilisation has no hour in it for a thirty-five-minute module, and the deadline is real.

Because the module is accessible from home and the person would rather do it there than stay late.

And because nobody allocated time for it. The compliance requirement arrives from one department, the roster is built by another, and the hour is never added.

How to resource it

Roster it. Named time in the schedule for required training, treated like any other task. This is the whole fix and it costs exactly what the training costs, which the organisation is already paying informally.

Where that is impossible, a time allowance claimed by exception, with the module list and expected durations published so people know what they are entitled to claim.

And a deadline that accounts for the roster: a four-week window for a population working rotating shifts, rather than a date.

Meetings on a day off

Team meetings scheduled for a day when part of the team is not working. Attendance is expected, the person comes in, and frequently nothing is paid or the time is treated as a favour.

The time is working time and in most arrangements it also triggers whatever minimum payment applies to attending on a non-working day, which is often more than the meeting lasts. That cost is the reason to schedule meetings on days everybody works, which is the better answer anyway.

Travel to training

Travel to a training venue that is not the usual workplace is generally working time, on the same reasoning as travel between sites.

A day's course at a venue two hours away is a ten-hour working day, and rostering it as a seven-hour day is a working-time problem as well as a pay one.

The number to produce

E-learning completions outside rostered hours, for one year, from the learning system and the roster.

It is precise, it is nobody's estimate, and it is usually the fastest way to get the whole subject of required-but-unrecorded activity taken seriously by people who dismissed the queue at the gate as anecdote.

The module that does not need to exist

Before resourcing required training properly it is worth counting it. A workforce doing fourteen annual modules, several of them overlapping and two of them required by a system nobody administers any more, is carrying a load that was accumulated rather than designed.

An audit of what is required, by whom and on what authority typically removes a third of it. That is a bigger reduction than any scheduling change, it costs an afternoon, and it makes the remaining modules easier to pay for properly — which is the point rather than a side effect.